4 ms·
Well this article is over 4 years old, which is positively Paleozoic in language development terms. But I am sure that the discussion here will be equally out o
by peterhi 12y ago
Well this article is over 4 years old, which is positively Paleozoic in language development terms. But I am sure that the discussion here will be equally out of date.
Can we have less of these sort of articles please, it was a waste of my time skimming it.