3 ms·

I can't tell whether you intend to agree or disagree with the quote. Your tone suggests you are disagreeing, but your content to me seems to be in agreement. (

• jfarmer 12y ago
  Welcome to HN!
• rdc12 12y ago
  Disagreeing, but it was late when I wrote it. I guess my counter argument would be that what is fundamentally computable and what someone choices to implement in a library are not the same thing. With languages that may be a bit closer to the truth, but I would also add things like what the language makes safe (type safety, memory safety etc). I did on the whole like your article thou, that small bit just got to me a bit