3 ms·
holy crap, check this out: http://img1.buyersbestfriend.com/mkg/snackspage/images/bpg.html http://img1.buyersbestfriend.com/mkg/snackspage/images/bpg.h... 186,
by asah 12y ago
holy crap, check this out:
http://img1.buyersbestfriend.com/mkg/snackspage/images/bpg.html http://img1.buyersbestfriend.com/mkg/snackspage/images/bpg.h...
186,967 ==> 29,872 and indistinguishable, 6.25:1
(and pls tell me if it breaks on your browser - I want to push this live!!!)
adam
- brunobowden 12y agoWorked for me on Chrome, Safari and Firefox Your issue if anything will be older browsers. Is there a way that it can detect browser side if something has failed?
- ChrisGranger 12y agoThat's far from indistinguishable to me. It's actually quite obvious that the BPG is blurring detail at that compression ratio. Edit: it's particularly noticeable in the wood grain patterns. Also, there's a soft grey dot to the left of the top of the lamp, 100px or so, that's entirely missing in the BPG. There are loads more examples... Edit again: the color saturation of the rug is pretty washed-out as well.
- galago 12y agoThe bpg image on your link has much lower contrast. I'm not sure if that can be fixed, but the images are substantially different. I wonder if jacking up the contrast on the bpg might make it look much worse.
- ajmurmann 12y agoBreaking in Safari on my iPad 3 running iOS 7: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/18855215/bpg.PNG https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/18855215/bpg.PNG