2 ms·
this is 100% BS, it's an illusion. you should read the Talk page of the wikipedia entry, where it's obvious there are some misinformed/deceptive folks took con
by spot 12y ago
this is 100% BS, it's an illusion.
you should read the Talk page of the wikipedia entry, where it's obvious there are some misinformed/deceptive folks took control of the page. See the comp.compression FAQ is a much better resource, as is the paper Brendt Wohlberg and Gerhard de Jager, "A review of the fractal image coding literature", IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1716--1729, Dec 1999 in particular " purely fractal-based schemes are not competitive with the current state of the art"
- anigbrowl 12y agoI'm not talking about the Wikipedia page, which does not in any case make mild claims about the technology. I'm recounting my personal experience of using it and being impressed by the results.