>This is not a matter of prudishness. I would be totally fine (see my other comment in this thread) You mean this one? "Sexualizing women has nothing to do wit

>This is not a matter of prudishness. I would be totally fine (see my other comment in this thread) You mean this one? "Sexualizing women has nothing to do with image processing research." How positively libertine of you. >You're missing the point And you're missing my point, which is that if you really weren't a prude, you wouldn't care either way. Straight men like pretty women, straight women like handsome men, gay men like handsome men, gay women like pretty women, some people like some combination of the above, some guys 40 years ago liked a pretty woman, who gives a fuck? Stop being offended by extremely tame displays of sexuality. >And now you're saying that French researchers don't care, but they do because they don't want to anger Americans? You city slickers don't seem very good with jokes, do you? I'd tell you to "lighten up" but I forgot that's code for "long live the patriarchy."