20 ms·
Yes, that makes it even stranger. Why use an unsigned 4-byte integer when tags are mapped to a number internally. Unless they anticipate to map more than 2^8-1
by pdknsk 12y ago
Yes, that makes it even stranger. Why use an unsigned 4-byte integer when tags are mapped to a number internally. Unless they anticipate to map more than 2^8-1 or 2^16-1 different tags.
Maybe I'm reading it wrong.
extension_tag ue7(32)
...
'extension_tag' is the extension tag. The following values are defined:
1: EXIF data.
PS. I think I understand now. It's just meant as a shortcut. Not sure why this is done when EXIF fits just as well.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- lukeh 12y agoSeems like EXIF data was originally to be included as part of the base spec (see dangling reference to exif_present_flag).