3 ms·

The two spacecraft are meant to do two completely different things. Orion was designed for deep space exploration, Dragon is not.

by efuquen 12y ago

jwcooper 12y ago
Sort of. According to Wikipedia the plans are for the Dragon to be modified into the "Red Dragon" for future mars missions. "Red Dragon is a modified SpaceX Dragon capsule for low-cost Mars lander missions using Falcon Heavy rockets. Plans call for a sample return rover to be delivered to the Martian surface while also testing techniques to enter the Martian atmosphere with equipment a human crew could eventually use." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Dragon_(spacecraft) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Dragon_(spacecraft)
- chrisMn 12y ago
  Note, for all you "SpaceX and NASA are competitors" people, that the Red Dragon design study was something that NASA paid for.[1] SpaceX and NASA are are on the same side in reality. Only in magical internet flamewarland, carried out by people who don't do any of this for a living, are they in opposition. [1]: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20120013431.pdf http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/2012001...
  - austinz 12y ago
    It would make more sense to contrast SpaceX with ULA or any of the other rocketry startups. Whatever long-term plans SpaceX have aren't very relevant to the current supplier-contractor partnership that SpaceX and NASA share.
  - seanflyon 12y ago
    You point is correct, but SpaceX is competing directly with the SLS which according to Wikipedia is designed by NASA. I am under the impression that the ULA will produce the SLS, but after a quick search I can only find reference to ULA producing the upper stage (http://www.ulalaunch.com/united-launch-alliance-hosts-nasa.aspx http://www.ulalaunch.com/united-launch-alliance-hosts-nasa.a...). NASA as a whole is not competing with SpaceX, but some parts of it are, unless "designed by" really just means "funded by".

The two spacecraft are meant to do two completely different things. Orion was designed for deep space exploration, Dragon is not.

by efuquen 12y ago

The two spacecraft are meant to do two completely different things. Orion was designed for deep space exploration, Dragon is not.

jwcooper 12y ago

Sort of. According to Wikipedia the plans are for the Dragon to be modified into the "Red Dragon" for future mars missions. "Red Dragon is a modified SpaceX Dragon capsule for low-cost Mars lander missions using Falcon Heavy rockets. Plans call for a sample return rover to be delivered to the Martian surface while also testing techniques to enter the Martian atmosphere with equipment a human crew could eventually use." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Dragon_(spacecraft) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Dragon_(spacecraft)

chrisMn 12y ago
Note, for all you "SpaceX and NASA are competitors" people, that the Red Dragon design study was something that NASA paid for.[1] SpaceX and NASA are are on the same side in reality. Only in magical internet flamewarland, carried out by people who don't do any of this for a living, are they in opposition. [1]: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20120013431.pdf http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/2012001...
- austinz 12y ago
  It would make more sense to contrast SpaceX with ULA or any of the other rocketry startups. Whatever long-term plans SpaceX have aren't very relevant to the current supplier-contractor partnership that SpaceX and NASA share.
- seanflyon 12y ago
  You point is correct, but SpaceX is competing directly with the SLS which according to Wikipedia is designed by NASA. I am under the impression that the ULA will produce the SLS, but after a quick search I can only find reference to ULA producing the upper stage (http://www.ulalaunch.com/united-launch-alliance-hosts-nasa.aspx http://www.ulalaunch.com/united-launch-alliance-hosts-nasa.a...). NASA as a whole is not competing with SpaceX, but some parts of it are, unless "designed by" really just means "funded by".