3 ms·
Okay, so those men who will only accept a woman's company if she is subordinate are having a harder time to find a willing partner. What's wrong with that?
by rainmaking 12y ago
Okay, so those men who will only accept a woman's company if she is subordinate are having a harder time to find a willing partner.
What's wrong with that?
- eyeJam 12y agoApparently there's enough wrong with that to justify a 2716 word screed (and that's just part 1!!!)
- rainmaking 12y agoI can write part 2 in Perl. print "whine"x2716
- zo1 12y agoThat's a completely false misrepresentation of what the article is talking about. To boil it all down to "men can't find willing partners if 'she' isn't subordinate to them" is quite frankly, very dishonest. I'm disappointed if you didn't actually read the article before commenting on it the way you did. But I would be quite a bit less appalled at that option, than the one of you having actually read the article, and still interpreted the way it seems you did from your post.
- rainmaking 12y agoIf it's a false misrepresentation, that would make it a true representation, no? Regardless, be appalled, I read it and all I heard was an obsolete species of man whining that it sucks to be a dinosaur.