4 ms·
> actually set up this foundation because they’re still hoping that Joyent will let them to use the Node.js trademark. Is that naivete on the side of Io.js her
by debacle 12y ago
> actually set up this foundation because they’re still hoping that Joyent will let them to use the Node.js trademark.
Is that naivete on the side of Io.js here, or is there more to the story?
- craigching 12y agoI'm not sure what you're asking, you left out the key part of the quote: > the team hasn’t actually set up this foundation because they’re still hoping that Joyent will let them to use the Node.js trademark. Frankly, I kinda like the name Io.js better than Node.js
- debacle 12y agoIt's more likely that they be called Microsoft.js than Node.js at this point.
- dragonwriter 12y ago> Frankly, I kinda like the name Io.js better than Node.js Well, if it was for a project that was implementing Io [0] on top of JavaScript, sure. For a server-side JS stack based on V8, I don't really like the name at all. [0] http://iolanguage.org/ http://iolanguage.org/