3 ms·

So you are disagreeing with the entire premise of the article. You are calling bullshit. That's interesting, given that the author specifically debunks the stat

So you are disagreeing with the entire premise of the article. You are calling bullshit. That's interesting, given that the author specifically debunks the stats you are quoting.

coldtea 12y ago
>That's interesting, given that the author specifically debunks the stats you are quoting. He doesn't debunk much, if anything at all. He has a predetermined conclusion and he hacks his way to reach it. Instead of quoting statistics and measurements, he quotes a NYT article (that doesn't back him up as much as he think) and does the equivalent of rigorous hand waiving with nebulous arguments.