4 ms·
The title of this article is as misleading as it gets (and for that reason, I've flagged this HN post). While CoreOS is developing a competing solution, they ca
by conradk 12y ago
The title of this article is as misleading as it gets (and for that reason, I've flagged this HN post). While CoreOS is developing a competing solution, they cannot just "break with Docker" since that is what most of their customers probably use now. In fact, CoreOS announced support for Docker 1.3.2 2 days ago, despite them launching Rocket:
https://coreos.com/blog/docker-1-3-2-stable-channel/ https://coreos.com/blog/docker-1-3-2-stable-channel/
I think Rocket is just one attempt not to become useless now that Docker's scope is expanding. There was an interesting post about the predictability of CoreOS's move a few days ago on HN:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8688392 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8688392
- fceller 12y agoI thought that one should not change the title and use the original one of the post. What would have been a better title? "ZDNets view on Docker vs. CoreOS"?
- conradk 12y agoI'm not sure about that what the best title would have been. But the guidelines say: "Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait." I think in this case, zdnet's title is misleading, so changing it would probably have been a good thing.
- fceller 12y agoOk, understood. Thanks.