3 ms·
Fair enough, my main point was that it looks like it loads exactly the same with JS disabled compared to without it being disabled, my additional commentary was
by codezero 12y ago
Fair enough, my main point was that it looks like it loads exactly the same with JS disabled compared to without it being disabled, my additional commentary was tangential, but if we're all complaining about stuff, can't I too? :)
- dredmorbius 12y agoIt's possible (I haven't checked) that enabling/disabling JS caches content that's required to view the page. Which is another reason I really hate QAing / capability / compatibility testing websites.
- codezero 12y agoPlausible. I loaded the site with TorBrowser with NoScript on, and it looks fine still, are you using Lynx? :)
- dredmorbius 12y agoChromium.