3 ms·
All of those options provide message-centered data flows. You have to define the message format--JSON, BSON (lol), or even protobuff would work fine. Just beca
by angersock 12y ago
All of those options provide message-centered data flows. You have to define the message format--JSON, BSON (lol), or even protobuff would work fine.
Just because you refuse to use well-established tools doesn't mean they aren't there.
- lmm 12y agoThe serialization part - JSON, BSON or protobuf - is the part I'm complaining about. I have plenty of perfectly good ways to copy a packet of bytes from A to B. I want something that offers the safety guarantees of protobuf with a "simple case" that's as easy as e.g. Jackson. And I want something that can send functions, not just inert structs.