3 ms·
Even though I am a massive supporter and advocate of whistle-blowing and leaking (in the public interest), the state of a lot of the journalism around this is a
by secfirstmd 12y ago
Even though I am a massive supporter and advocate of whistle-blowing and leaking (in the public interest), the state of a lot of the journalism around this is appalling - esp the Gawker article. (Though the Wired one is pretty responsible in fairness.)
Unless Sony has shown to be doing something malicious (which I don't think it has - other than some horrific Adam Sandler movies recently), then the angle of mining the data just to create click-bait headlines is particularly infuriating.
Yes, it is right to report such a large cyber intrusion in the public interest, especially if people's data has been taken (and Sony already had this problem occur before - so it is worth pointing out that they had a chance to tighten up security) but trawling through the internal data of an innocent private company and exposing it online, just to gossip, is particularly poor journalism. Having worked with a lot of media, you can be sure they rightly wouldn't be too happy if people did that to them - just for kicks.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- serve_yay 12y agoDuring/after the recent leak of celebrities' private photos, the condemnation was swift and serious. People can see how that directly applies to their own life, they wouldn't want their photos out there like that. But when it's a company -- it's apparently OK to just look through all their shit. It's already publicly available anyway, so what's the big deal?