I'm confused about the title of this. I've never heard an argument that went "Java sucks because you are forced to (thing on this list)". It's always been "Jav

I'm confused about the title of this. I've never heard an argument that went "Java sucks because you are forced to (thing on this list)". It's always been "Java sucks because it lacks (thing it certainly lacks)" or "Java sucks because it forces you to (thing it certainly forces you to do)", or, closest to this article, "Java sucks because it encourages you to (bad practice, such as those mentioned in this article)". None of these does the article refute. I've seen places that used Java, and had most of these, and places that used Java and had little of it. I've seen places that used other languages that had all of these, and other places that used those same other languages that had none of it. This seems kind of orthogonal, and as such a bit of a strawman; is it in response to some specific arguments I've just not heard?