4 ms·
The implication is that Bitcoin isn't "real" money. Never mind that money is a social construct and is useful whenever two parties agree on a common value.
by ryanthejuggler 12y ago
The implication is that Bitcoin isn't "real" money.
Never mind that money is a social construct and is useful whenever two parties agree on a common value.
- furyofantares 12y agoI think the implication is actually that the person sending this transaction was also the recipient.
- ryanthejuggler 12y agoGood point; your explanation makes more sense. I pretty much only use Bitcoin to buy lunch and laptop stickers, so I forget that people with significant amounts of it have to shuffle it like this.