5 ms·
If it was a credit card transaction, it'd be 2,406,506.
by greenleafjacob 12y ago
If it was a credit card transaction, it'd be 2,406,506.
- stonogo 12y agoIf it were a credit card transaction, money would have changed hands.
- thisjepisje 12y agoCare to elaborate?
- ryanthejuggler 12y agoThe implication is that Bitcoin isn't "real" money. Never mind that money is a social construct and is useful whenever two parties agree on a common value.
- furyofantares 12y agoI think the implication is actually that the person sending this transaction was also the recipient.
- ryanthejuggler 12y agoGood point; your explanation makes more sense. I pretty much only use Bitcoin to buy lunch and laptop stickers, so I forget that people with significant amounts of it have to shuffle it like this.
- stonogo 12y agoThis was pretty obviously some internal accounting shuffling and not some kind of payment processing. If your bank charges a fee to move funds between accounts your bank sucks.
- murbard2 12y agoProbably not, it would have likely been netted between the banks without requirement a settlement.
- ceejayoz 12y agoAnyone doing that volume in credit card transactions isn't paying a 2.9% rate like you and I would selling trinkets... and the fee's paying for a variety of protections not present in a Bitcoin transaction.
- serve_yay 12y agoIf grandma had balls she'd be grampa. Nobody moves 82 million with a credit card, that's not even what they're for.