4 ms·
This is actually becoming my chief complaint about submissions. It appears to me as if folks now believe that it's cool to submit links which resolve as deeply
by Quequau 12y ago
This is actually becoming my chief complaint about submissions. It appears to me as if folks now believe that it's cool to submit links which resolve as deeply and closely as possible to subject (in this case a the subdirectory inside the project's repo) with total disregard to the fact that there is insufficient (or no) information describing why we should be interested in the link or what, if anything, we should discuss.
I'm willing to bet the submitter went through a series of links beginning with some sort of announcement that something changed to get to the link they submitted. Why do folks think that we would not also benefit from that information or that it would not help to foster more interesting discussion?
- protomyth 12y agoWhy? Probably because the "blog spam" or "only submit the original source" comments will show up and submissions get flagged. Happens enough that I would imagine the submitter probably followed all the links in response to prior submissions.
- untog 12y agoIt would be better if we could change titles, but more often than not mods revert them back to whatever the page title is.