3 ms·
1) As a customer, I don't care at all what insurance my driver has to protect him or herself in the event they cause an accident. Should I? 2) The requirement
by jasonisalive 12y ago
1) As a customer, I don't care at all what insurance my driver has to protect him or herself in the event they cause an accident. Should I?
2) The requirement that road users have insurance is in my opinion completely separate to what those road-users do with their vehicles. Shouldn't it be?
3) People are not "hopeless at assessing risk." That's a ludicrous assertion. Everytime anybody buys anything, goes anywhere, or does anything, they are assessing risk. Buying goods off Ebay = assessing risks. Eating at a restaurant = assessing risks. Walking down the street = assessing risks.
- DanBC 12y ago3) People are not "hopeless at assessing risk." That's a ludicrous assertion. No, you are wrong. People over-estimate the probability of rare events and under estimate the probability of common events. There are a bunch of biases that make people really bad at assessing risk. The examples you give - all of them needed extensive modification to help people assess the risk or to protect people from the risk. (Ebay introduced reputation systems and gives stern advice about not paying for goods with Western Union cash transfer; retaurants have to comply with hygiene laws backed up by inspection - how many people bother to ask to see the kitchen or the staff loos before eating somewhere?)