2 ms·
The interesting part is that recruiters seem more in agreement when identifying low performers. When faced with a high performer their scores differ wildly.
by rumcajz 12y ago
The interesting part is that recruiters seem more in agreement when identifying low performers. When faced with a high performer their scores differ wildly.
- ghaff 12y agoIt wouldn't especially surprise me if that were the case. It's a lot easier to identify people who don't meet the requirements of a position than to intuit how good a job they'll do based on paper qualifications. You'll make mistakes in both cases, but more in the latter. Testing like SATs are similar. A low score is probably a much better predictor of (lack of) success at an elite school than a high score is a predictor of success.