As stated, the article's wrong, but at least in this day and age of comments and instant-feedback-journalism, he's admitting it and being corrected -- rather th

As stated, the article's wrong, but at least in this day and age of comments and instant-feedback-journalism, he's admitting it and being corrected -- rather than long, angry "Dear Sir" letters. A victory for crowdsourced journalism, or another sign that professional publishing is doomed - when the audience know more than the writer?