3 ms·

You comment is informative but it contains a magnitude error. It should be 2.47gbit, not 2.47tbit. https://www.google.com/search?q=1+kibibit+per+second+*+30+d

• skuhn 12y ago
  You're right. 1kbit/s over a month would result in 2.47gbit of data transferred, which is a bit less damning. To get to 2.47tbit, you would of course need 1mbit/s transferred (which is still not that much!). However flawed my example, I think my point remains valid: data usage measured over arbitrary time periods makes no sense when the underlying infrastructure is built with blocks that only care about instantaneous transfer rates.
  • daveloyall 12y ago
    I agree.