3 ms·
Sure it does. At least when that scarce resource is artificially constrained. Now that doesn't mean it shouldn't have restraints. But it does mean there are wi
by forrestthewoods 12y ago
Sure it does. At least when that scarce resource is artificially constrained.
Now that doesn't mean it shouldn't have restraints. But it does mean there are winners and losers and it is perfectly fair and reasonable to call them out.
(Edit: Who the hell is downvoting the artificial scarcity comments? That's absurd. Care to have an actual discussion?)
- AnthonyMouse 12y agoIt's not artificial scarcity. The US doesn't have an unlimited capacity for immigration. We can argue around the edges of what the correct number is, but whatever number we pick, there are still going to be more people than that who want to be US citizens and we still need to choose between them somehow.