3 ms·
Isn't html5 supposed to be a living standard [1], meaning continuous updates and no html:next spec? [1] https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#What_does_.22Living_St
by cabirum 12y ago
Isn't html5 supposed to be a living standard [1], meaning continuous updates and no html:next spec?
[1] https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#What_does_.22Living_Standard.22_mean.3F https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#What_does_.22Living_Standar...
- jfmercer 12y agoYes.
- cletusw 12y agoYou have to differentiate between the WHATWG and the W3C, which have different goals/purposes and different HTML specs. As the link you referenced states, the WHATWG's non-versioned living standard attempts to stay "a little ahead of the implementations" with the goal of (hopefully) guiding implementors toward common goals. The W3C periodically looks at already-implemented features and creates versioned snapshots (like HTML5, HTML5.1, etc.) with the goal of providing developers with a stable, known set of features for development. Different purposes, different specs, both useful.