It purports to be an article about correctly analyzing Charter school articles, but then it goes into advocacy mode cherry picking the stats it wants to while f

It purports to be an article about correctly analyzing Charter school articles, but then it goes into advocacy mode cherry picking the stats it wants to while framing the whole argument in a specific light. I didn't call it a "hit piece" because I necessarily disagree with the statistics the author chose to present. I called it a hit piece because of the specific statistics the author chose to present and the condescending manner in which the author presented them.