Thanks. I had to Google "CAM" because I wasn't familiar with the acronym off the top of my head. The diagnosing physician was definitely a member of IFM...I d

Thanks. I had to Google "CAM" because I wasn't familiar with the acronym off the top of my head. The diagnosing physician was definitely a member of IFM...I distinctly remember a certificate on his wall from them for something. In retrospect, the IFM-affiliated doctors and the DOs were all more compassionate and slightly more helpful than most of the 'traditional' MDs. I guess because they emphasize the more holistic approach/perspective, which is what was needed. The diagnosing doctor was not a New Age-y, 'alternative' type doctor, though, in the way people normally categorize them. Too much touchy-feely, pseudo-scientific stuff makes me nervous. The documentary I mention mainly contrasts those who believe in chronic Lyme and long-term antibiotic treatment with those that do not. There is one doctor, mentioned fairly briefly, that is what I would call normally call an 'alternative' doctor as it has come to be described in the common vernacular. Long-term antibiotics, while controversial, are not really an 'alternative' treatment as I commonly think of it...? It's a controversial application of a traditional treatment. (Even though, frustratingly, they are happily used for longer periods for things like acne without the outrage.) Maybe I'm reading too much into the word 'alternative' - it's become a fairly loaded term. In any case, I do like a more comprehensive approach and am glad I found it. Otherwise, I'm sure I would still be very ill. Yes, not knowing what I had was definitely one of the worst parts of the whole thing.