> They are real needs. So, not having these features means not to satisfy some user requirements. Not necessarily. Some are needs, some just wants. Software sh

> They are real needs. So, not having these features means not to satisfy some user requirements. Not necessarily. Some are needs, some just wants. Software should offer solution to user's problem, not features. Often features are wanted just because user has a particular vision of solving his problem which requires these features, but that does not mean that there is not more elegant way to solve the problem with less features. > I'm afraid UI/feature minimalists will never understand why on earth so many people will pay $650 (or whatever) for MS Office, the mother of all feature monsters. I am afraid many who paid for MS Office won't know themselves. And I bet many of those still use spaces instead of tabs in Word :(