3 ms·
Probably, but at the same time (and the article touches upon this a bit) the Internet is somewhat of an all encompassing medium the increasing use of which is n
by georgemcbay 12y ago
Probably, but at the same time (and the article touches upon this a bit) the Internet is somewhat of an all encompassing medium the increasing use of which is not necessarily a sign of negative addiction.
I use the Internet a lot, but that is because the Internet has grown to encompass some amount of nearly every aspect of my life, not (in my non-professional opinion) because I have an addictive tendency toward it.
I'm a software developer, so clearly Internet use for research/testing/etc is very common; I'm a movie/tv watcher and all of my at-home movie/tv watching has migrated to the Internet; I'm a reader and most of my reading has migrated to the Internet (at the very least for delivery to my Kindle); I'm a gamer and most of the games I play have at least some Internet-based multiplayer component; I'm a hobbyist at various things like photography, quadcopter building/flying, and 3D printing and the Internet is a spectacular way to communicate with like-minded hobbyists, so I do; I'm someone who lives across the country from most of my extended family, and we keep in contact via the Internet (in addition to occasional phone calls and visits, but the contact via the Internet is much more consistent due to the easy time-shifting of leaving messages).
I spend hours and hours and hours a day on the Internet, but OTOH I can easily go camping for a week or two and live completely without it with no ill effects. I have IRL friends I spend time with on a weekly basis, I "get out" and do plenty of things not related to the Internet, etc. So while I use it very often on a regular basis, that in and of itself does not signify an addiction, as far as I understand it (again, in my non-professional opinion).
- iandanforth 12y agoWhat you're describing is the distinction between addiction and high engagement. The DSM unfortunately doesn't do a good job with this distinction as its criteria for addiction are heavily based on chemical addictions. The DSM works like sorta like this: If you meet 4 out of 6 basic criteria for addiction you're addicted. For behavioral addictions unfortunately they use the wrong criteria (At least they did in DSM-IV). The only things you really care about are the negative consequences (as most people understand intuitively) and not some arbitrary number like "spends more than 60 hours a week involved in this activity."
- emodendroket 12y agoBut that's also the trouble, isn't it? It's a bit like people who are compulsive overeaters -- the easiest thing to do would be to just totally abstain, like most reformed alcoholics choose to, but you can't just stop eating and you can't just never use the Internet.
- djloche 12y agoThe internet is like electricity - you can live without it, but due it the prevalent use of it, you will not be part of modern society/culture and be at a significant disadvantage in terms of economic impact vs those who use it.
- crpatino 12y agoYou could have said the same thing about tobacco, 50 years ago. That did not make the suffering of those with the proclivity to develop cancer any less gruesome.