4 ms·
It's worth noting that Pale Moon is actually slower than Firefox stable: http://portableapps.com/node/39509 http://portableapps.com/node/39509 It's also incomp
by JohnTHaller 12y ago
It's worth noting that Pale Moon is actually slower than Firefox stable: http://portableapps.com/node/39509 http://portableapps.com/node/39509
It's also incompatible with many extensions.
- smacktoward 12y agoNot to mention it adds another party you have to trust not to insert unwanted/malicious code into your browser. When I get binaries from Mozilla, I only have to trust Mozilla. When I get binaries from my distro's repositories, I only have to trust Mozilla and my distro's maintainers. Both of those are entities I know and trust already, so I'm comfortable with that. But I don't know anything about Pale Moon.
- nnethercote 12y agoMy favourite ever comment about Pale Moon, for which I unfortunately can't remember the original source, is that it is "snake oil for users who are convinced that compiling with -O666 -funroll-all-loops will give them a better browser".