3 ms·
For a post that according to the title is about Rocket, it's interesting that Rocket (and CoreOS) aren't even mentioned until paragraph 12. The previous 11 par
by orand 12y ago
For a post that according to the title is about Rocket, it's interesting that Rocket (and CoreOS) aren't even mentioned until paragraph 12. The previous 11 paragraphs are all "blah blah blah Docker". Seems like Docker is pretty full of themselves.
- thebeardisred 12y agoI see you got a recent copy. The original p12 follows follows: A small number of vendors disagree with this direction. Some have expressed their concern that, as Docker expands its scope, there may be less room for them to create differentiated, value-added offerings. In some cases, these vendors want to create orchestration solution that are tailored for their particular infrastructure or offerings, and do not welcome the notion of portability. In some cases, of course, there are technical or philosophical differences. We hope to address some of the technical arguments posed by the Rocket project in a subsequent post.
- Titanous 12y agoHere's the original: https://web.archive.org/web/20141201195306/https://blog.docker.com/2014/12/initial-thoughts-on-the-rocket-announcement/ https://web.archive.org/web/20141201195306/https://blog.dock...
- Touche 12y agoYes, this is not HN worthy. There is very little talk about Rocket at all. This is just a quick PR piece.