5 ms·
There's a Chinese institution that publishes a comparison of all the world's major universities, based on number of paper citations to its faculty. It's been a
by bokonist 17y ago
There's a Chinese institution that publishes a comparison of all the world's major universities, based on number of paper citations to its faculty. It's been a while, but US universities held all but 2 positions in the top twenty (Cambridge and Oxford were the only non-US universities). Research is not the same as learning, but its probably as good a proxy as we've got.
Journal publishing and citations are heavily based on social networks and the intricacies of the modern grant system. I really wouldn't trust citations to be a good indicator of research or advancement. A better thing to look at would be the flow of real world improvements that come out of a universities research. Unfortunately, there is no systematic measurement of that flow.
- miked 17y agoI quite agree, but as you point out we don't have a lot of choices here. That's the best proxy I can think of.
- johnnybgoode 17y agoWhen the only measure available is hopelessly flawed, the correct approach isn't to use it; it's to say, "I don't know."