3 ms·
Why specifically? I always considered this a relatively safe way to transmit encrypted data. Assuming you have secure key exchange worked out, which is always t
by Phlarp 12y ago
Why specifically? I always considered this a relatively safe way to transmit encrypted data. Assuming you have secure key exchange worked out, which is always the harder part anyway.
- smtddr 12y agoI'm not sure if this is what the OP meant, but this[1] is what I think of when I hear anyone mention "Truecrypt". 1. http://motherboard.vice.com/read/nsa-paranoia-has-fanned-the-flames-of-truecrypt-conspiracy-theories http://motherboard.vice.com/read/nsa-paranoia-has-fanned-the...
- Phlarp 12y agoAh, I guess I should have qualified my statement with "assuming the underlying crypto of truecrypt is secure, does sharing the ciphertext via bittorrent introduce any further side channel attacks outside of compromising the key exchange?"