Interesting that a lot of this is about "What stands the test of time?" Papers from 1994 to 2004 perhaps didn't have enough time to work their way through the

Interesting that a lot of this is about "What stands the test of time?" Papers from 1994 to 2004 perhaps didn't have enough time to work their way through the system. What I find interesting is the gap of time between papers for the authors with multiple listings. A casual look suggests no more than 12 years between papers. This could be because it's a young field, but I found that worth noting. p.s. To be pedantic, we should put 2004 in the title.