I've read it before. It's a fluff piece for Erlang. You can tell that it's not a serious argument since he doesn't acknowledge why things are done a certain way

I've read it before. It's a fluff piece for Erlang. You can tell that it's not a serious argument since he doesn't acknowledge why things are done a certain way in OOP and what the advantages are. He obviously things the cons outweigh the pros, but Armstrong doesn't have to feign ignorance on the matter.