3 ms·
> This is the dbus post I'm referring to: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8648437 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8648437 Oh right, somebody looked a
by the_why_of_y 12y ago
> This is the dbus post I'm referring to: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8648437 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8648437
Oh right, somebody looked at the spec for 15 minutes, mis-read it completely (confusing the authentication protocol with the actual IPC protocol) and wrote a blog rant about their failure in reading comprehension. Very compelling.
> The fact that you even NEED a (crappy) doc is a sign it doesn't use the Unix design philosophy.
So HTTP is against the UNIX philosophy too? Or did you also happen to implement that without ever looking at the specification?
> In contrast, look at the Debian Control File format, which apt metadata is stored in.
In other words, apples make better apple juice than oranges.
> That reason being: you simply end up with less code when your systems are modular and composable.
You seem to be under the mis-apprehension that monolithic is somehow an antonym of modular. systemd is both modular and monolithic (in your meaning of that term).