2 ms·
http://moms4mom.com http://moms4mom.com is the only one I've heard of. Still, the site format is optimized for really narrow verticals. I think they're going t
by onewland 17y ago
http://moms4mom.com http://moms4mom.com is the only one I've heard of.
Still, the site format is optimized for really narrow verticals. I think they're going to have trouble overcoming the fact that the best example of their knowledge engine's success is really inaccessible to the average user. I'm guessing even a lot of IT guys would have trouble understanding/demonstrating how useful StackExchange might be for a topic completely unrelated to code.
edit: I do think the technology is very interesting, just that non-technical people will have trouble seeing that.
- tocomment 17y agoThat's cool. The site looks why good, why do you think it isn't suitable for non-technicals? I wish I could think of some cool topics to make one for.
- codexon 17y agoThe color scheme is hard on the eyes like meta and superuser. I think they need to hire a designer.
- onewland 17y agoI think that, until you see a populated StackExchange site (with content you understand), it's not really clear how useful it can be. Non-technical people pretty much just have moms4mom.com to look at right now.
- codexon 17y agoAmusingly, Jon Skeet is only 3rd place for most reputation there.