3 ms·
Actually Clang doesn't implement the listed built-in functions (yet?). They're type-generic versions. http://llvm.org/releases/3.5.0/tools/clang/docs/LanguageE
by cremno 12y ago
Actually Clang doesn't implement the listed built-in functions (yet?). They're type-generic versions.
http://llvm.org/releases/3.5.0/tools/clang/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#checked-arithmetic-builtins http://llvm.org/releases/3.5.0/tools/clang/docs/LanguageExte...
http://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#checked-arithmetic-builtins http://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#checked-a...
- justincormack 12y agoAh yes. The generic versions are nicer to use, and can be used for mixed types. It seems gcc will implement the clang compatible ones too.