Nate, we don't really have a convention or guideline for this situation. The guidelines only tell us to add [pdf], [video], and similar to the title if it's a l

Nate, we don't really have a convention or guideline for this situation. The guidelines only tell us to add [pdf], [video], and similar to the title if it's a link to a media file. Though it's not exactly stated, it means a direct link to the media file itself, rather than a link to the page where the media files can be downloaded. For example, we (almost?) never see "[video]" tags in the titles of stories linking to youtube or vimeo. On previous USENIX submissions I've put some variation of "[pdf/slides/video]" in the title to indicate multiple things are available, but this just created unnecessary work for poor `dang` who had to edit the title to remove it. I really do try to avoid causing work for the moderators, so this time, I did not put the extra info in the title. I was proud of myself for learning from my mistake... until I saw `dang` adding a comment with a direct link to the paper pdf. (sigh, I'll probably never learn ;) If there is a "right" answer, then I still haven't figured it out yet. As for my access pattern, I actually found the USENIX page from another site listing various papers, so that's what I was looking for when I loaded the page. I made sure the USENIX actually did provide a download link to the full paper PDF (sometimes they don't/can't), and then started downloading the video with wget in the background while I read the paper... I still haven't watched the video yet, but I will.