4 ms·
Not really. Had the colonists had better representation in parliament then the case for separation would have been non-existent, but as it stood even Burke, who
by fidotron 12y ago
Not really. Had the colonists had better representation in parliament then the case for separation would have been non-existent, but as it stood even Burke, who famously opposed the French Revolution, thought they had a point.
- pfisch 12y agoMost of the English population didn't even have representation in parliament. Its very convenient how this wasn't an issue until America owed England a huge amount of money. What about all previous import/export taxes up until the revolution?