5 ms·
Nice, but the answers being phrases ruins it for me, because you start seeing the answers without needed to check the regular expressions. Really nicely design
by natch 12y ago
Nice, but the answers being phrases ruins it for me, because you start seeing the answers without needed to check the regular expressions.
Really nicely designed though. Clean UI. Wouldn't mind if it was enlarged to use more of the screen real estate (tiny fonts are hard to read). I had fun with this.
- paco3346 12y agoI thought about this too- the phrases- but, isn't that how normal crossword puzzles are? You can gather clues from the context of surrounding words when doing one of those puzzles.
- natch 12y agoNot really, because rather than using an entire coherent phrase that goes from the top to the bottom of the puzzle, crossword puzzles use discrete and often unrelated words throughout.
- schoen 12y agoIt's most like a theme clue -- in an American-style crossword you often have 1 to 4 extra-long answers, almost always horizontal, that are related to a theme (they might be puns, or proverbial sayings, or together spell out a longer quote). It's sometimes possible to solve a theme clue in a crossword when you have only a few letters, if you understand the theme well enough. In this case, the "suddenly solving the whole thing given only 40% or 50% of the letters" effect can be kind of cool, or annoying if you were enjoying the logic puzzle aspect. In the original MIT Mystery Hunt hexagonal regular expression crossword, most of the grid did not spell anything recognizable, so it was clearly a logic puzzle through-and-through. I guess whether people appreciate that depends on whether they were expecting a pure logic puzzle or a combined logic+word puzzle.
- dlgeek 12y ago+1. This is especially true for "Experienced #5" which required me to figure out about 4 letters out of 16 using the regex, the rest being obvious from the clue and the other 4 letters. All the hitchhikers ones are pretty obvious though.