>'The author's article's point amounts to: "The smartest Chinese tend to be more successful and can afford more children, and this is eugenics."' Agreed, and i

>'The author's article's point amounts to: "The smartest Chinese tend to be more successful and can afford more children, and this is eugenics."' Agreed, and it sounds like the author has an axe to grind for some odd reason. It's not eugenics that he's attacking only, note the implicit blame of "Darwinians" and "Galtonians" as being a cause for these policies.