4 ms·

"Let me explain why I think this is very bad news for writers." "I don't link to Kindle ebooks because Amazon don't pay an affiliate fee on them." Riiiiight.

by st3fan 17y ago

teamonkey 17y ago
That isn't his explanation why he thinks it's bad for writers, that's his answer why he doesn't link to kindle ebooks. His explanation is summarised at the end of the article.
- teamonkey 17y ago
  And because I was downmodded for that, here it is... > So, to summarize: what have I got against Amazon's Kindle? 1) DRM. (It's unethical, immoral, fattening, and a royal pain in the ass. To be fair: this also goes for other ebook platforms.) 2) Amazon reserves the right to delete work from your Kindle. (Under circumstances which are now a little clearer and a little tighter, but nevertheless still present.) 3) Censorship. 4) They're using their monopsony position to fuck over their suppliers (i.e. the publishers) in a manner that threatens a catastrophic crash in author royalties in the medium term (up to 5 years). NB: as a reader, you may enjoy the short term price benefit, but you'll pay for it in the long term in reduction of choice. 5) Their actions may start a trans-Atlantic price war between publishers, to the detriment of authors (again, in the medium term).
raquo 17y ago
He said he earns less than $250/y from affiliate links. The real reason is that the Kindle books give him much less income than dead-tree editions.
jfischer 17y ago
I think you are taking these quotes out of context. Charles Stross (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Stross http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Stross) is a writer and the books he is linking to are written by him. He uses the affiliate fees (maybe $250 a year) to help defray the hosting costs of his blog. The affiliate fee issue is only of a small part of his argument against Amazon's business model. Personally, I think that $9.99 is a fair price to pay for a DRM-encumbered ebook. There should be enough in that amount to pay the author, the publisher, and the retailer, especially given that they should get a larger volume with the lower price-point. Unfortunately, it looks like the allocations between the three parties are way out of wack.
jeremyw 17y ago
Some data. Here's Amazon's US & UK affiliate compensation charts. In the US, 10% on Kindle purchases, one of their higher payouts. I assume the UK program will offer specific Kindle payouts soon now that the Kindle is going international. https://affiliate-program.amazon.com/gp/associates/join/compensation.html https://affiliate-program.amazon.com/gp/associates/join/comp... https://affiliate-program.amazon.co.uk/gp/associates/join/compensation.html https://affiliate-program.amazon.co.uk/gp/associates/join/co...

"Let me explain why I think this is very bad news for writers." "I don't link to Kindle ebooks because Amazon don't pay an affiliate fee on them." Riiiiight.

by st3fan 17y ago

"Let me explain why I think this is very bad news for writers." "I don't link to Kindle ebooks because Amazon don't pay an affiliate fee on them." Riiiiight.

teamonkey 17y ago

That isn't his explanation why he thinks it's bad for writers, that's his answer why he doesn't link to kindle ebooks. His explanation is summarised at the end of the article.

teamonkey 17y ago
And because I was downmodded for that, here it is... > So, to summarize: what have I got against Amazon's Kindle? 1) DRM. (It's unethical, immoral, fattening, and a royal pain in the ass. To be fair: this also goes for other ebook platforms.) 2) Amazon reserves the right to delete work from your Kindle. (Under circumstances which are now a little clearer and a little tighter, but nevertheless still present.) 3) Censorship. 4) They're using their monopsony position to fuck over their suppliers (i.e. the publishers) in a manner that threatens a catastrophic crash in author royalties in the medium term (up to 5 years). NB: as a reader, you may enjoy the short term price benefit, but you'll pay for it in the long term in reduction of choice. 5) Their actions may start a trans-Atlantic price war between publishers, to the detriment of authors (again, in the medium term).

raquo 17y ago

He said he earns less than $250/y from affiliate links. The real reason is that the Kindle books give him much less income than dead-tree editions.

jfischer 17y ago

I think you are taking these quotes out of context. Charles Stross (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Stross http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Stross) is a writer and the books he is linking to are written by him. He uses the affiliate fees (maybe $250 a year) to help defray the hosting costs of his blog. The affiliate fee issue is only of a small part of his argument against Amazon's business model. Personally, I think that $9.99 is a fair price to pay for a DRM-encumbered ebook. There should be enough in that amount to pay the author, the publisher, and the retailer, especially given that they should get a larger volume with the lower price-point. Unfortunately, it looks like the allocations between the three parties are way out of wack.

jeremyw 17y ago

Some data. Here's Amazon's US & UK affiliate compensation charts. In the US, 10% on Kindle purchases, one of their higher payouts. I assume the UK program will offer specific Kindle payouts soon now that the Kindle is going international. https://affiliate-program.amazon.com/gp/associates/join/compensation.html https://affiliate-program.amazon.com/gp/associates/join/comp... https://affiliate-program.amazon.co.uk/gp/associates/join/compensation.html https://affiliate-program.amazon.co.uk/gp/associates/join/co...