4 ms·
It is his own work apparently. `The simulation is from my own micropolisJS (http://micropolisjs.graememcc.co.uk http://micropolisjs.graememcc.co.uk and https:/
by edvinbesic 12y ago
It is his own work apparently.
`The simulation is from my own micropolisJS (http://micropolisjs.graememcc.co.uk http://micropolisjs.graememcc.co.uk and https://github.com/graememcc/micropolisJS https://github.com/graememcc/micropolisJS) just stripped of the GPL License headers and attribution.`
- anamexis 12y agoThat is not the same person as the one who made the 3D.CITY game.
- stickydink 12y agoIt's not the same guy. He does give credit in the README, but still wrongfully stripped out the license information. https://github.com/lo-th/3d.city/blob/gh-pages/README.md https://github.com/lo-th/3d.city/blob/gh-pages/README.md "Start with the excelent port of Micropolis by graememcc"
- PythonicAlpha 12y agoIt is not necessary, that it is the same guy. When graememcc adds a new license to his own work, than he can do it and an other person can use this license with agreement of the first author. UPDATE: As much I see now, it seems that graememcc did not consent in using his work with altered license. So it is a violation.
- DanBC 12y agoThere are three pieces of software. Each software was written by one person. Micropolis is gpl'd. MicropolisJS is a version of that, and is also correctly licensed. 3DCity - the submission here - is written by someone else. This person stripped the gpl headers and re-used some code without correctly licensing that code.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- DanBC 12y agoNo! The author of MicropolisJS did not strip the licence. You are mis-reading that post.
- joshu 12y agolo-th is not graememcc.
- geographomics 12y agoAll the source code is available, and the previous work is cited, so how is this a violation of the license?