4 ms·
1,609,954,648 of those shares are labelled "indirect" - does that mean that they don't actually belong to him and he merely has controlling rights? iirc the wal
by presty 12y ago
1,609,954,648 of those shares are labelled "indirect" - does that mean that they don't actually belong to him and he merely has controlling rights? iirc the walton family is quite big
and his name is "Samuel Robson Walton", not "Walton Robson"
- jimeh 12y agoI don't know anything about stocks, but a quick google search for "indirect stock ownership" brings this up: https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080628050611AAoV2YK https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080628050611A... And also this which has more details: http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.958-1 http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.958-1