3 ms·
The problem is that backing up data is fundamentally a management task. It requires skills to actually do right. People view backing up their computer in the sa
by freework 12y ago
The problem is that backing up data is fundamentally a management task. It requires skills to actually do right. People view backing up their computer in the same way they view changing the oil in their car. Just like there is no button you press inside the car that says "change oil", there is never going to be a backup solution that is easy to use for the regular user. At least not one that does a complete job is backing everything up.
Here is how I handle 'backups': I never do it. If the data is important, I make sure I store it on a device that is already redundant. If I take a photo that I really want to keep, I'll send it to dropdox or google drive or gmail or some place like that. Neither my macbook, nor my iphone, nor my linux laptop is the canonical living place of anything important. If any of those devices were to disappear, I will lose stuff, but nothing important. This system I've sort of subconsciously migrated towards over the past decade or so of hard drive failures and lost phones.
- acveilleux 12y agoRedundancy != Backups. As a recovering sys admin, I want to state that fact again and again until it syncs in. The difference is that backups should provide point-in-time snapshots. Now some of the things you suggest provide some of that (Dropbox has some versioning) and manually copying things to multiple locations effectively makes a snapshot of that thing. Backup systems should do this automatically, on a schedule and comprehensively. It says a lot that the best I've used was time machine and it's not especially powerful. It does however "just work." I've wasted hundreds of hours of my life managing various backup software and they all pretty much sucked. They did however save my bacon a number of times.