3 ms·
> Meanwhile in reality people got upset because Glass owners had a camera on their face the entire time. This is surely the biggest thing. It always seemed lik
by Osmium 12y ago
> Meanwhile in reality people got upset because Glass owners had a camera on their face the entire time.
This is surely the biggest thing. It always seemed like a very tone-deaf move by Google to include a camera. It's not like Glass wouldn't have still been useful without it...
- ecspike 12y agoI don't it was tone-deaf at all. There were many action shots that I got while playing sports that I wouldn't have gotten otherwise. The main problem was people thinking that the presence of a camera meant that you were using it all the time. Worry less about Glass and more about the guys doing upskirt videos with their shoes or specially rigged duffle bags.
- icebraining 12y agoThe difference is that there's no danger of shoe cameras for upskirt videos turning into a trend used by any significant share of the population. I don't mind a single smart glasses user, but I'm wary of glasses with cameras becoming common enough that you're effectively always potentially being filmed. And Glass, more than just a smart pair of glasses, is a symbol foreshadowing such a future.
- myko 12y agoActually, the camera is just about the only useful part of Glass. My wife and I went house hunting last year and it was really convenient to quickly snap photos of what we liked/didn't like at each house. Sure I could've done that with a phone but or camera but Glass was much more convenient. Same thing at family gatherings and hanging out with kids - having such a convenient camera available allows for some amazing shots one would probably never get otherwise. IMO it's sad that there was such a social backlash against Glass. If one wants to be creepy there are much less conspicuous cameras to use.