3 ms·
Isn't that kind of like saying "They're still working on HTML after 23 years"? Technically you're right, but version 1.1 of XForms was completed and published o
by matthewmacleod 12y ago
Isn't that kind of like saying "They're still working on HTML after 23 years"? Technically you're right, but version 1.1 of XForms was completed and published over 5 years ago.
That said, XForms is dead AFAIK, and that's not a bad thing.
- gsnedders 12y agoWork on XForms 2.0 is ongoing! Odds of it ever getting implemented in a browser are slim, however.
- AlainCouthures 12y agoMy XForms implementation (XSLTForms) works in a browser using XSLT and Javascript. The next version will even just require Javascript!
- tootie 12y agoYeah, my point was more along the lines of they've been working for 10 years and gotten near zero adoption. Not saying it will fail again for sure, but if this had value, XForms would have found it. URL-encoded POST data works just fine.
- jkrems 12y agoXForms has a bigger scope and is connected to XHTML. Two good reasons why this might succeed where XForms failed.