4 ms·
It comes out of the culture of co-funding. If you claim to VC Tom that you have other interest from VC Bob, Tom is going to call Bob and believe his word over y
by michaelochurch 12y ago
It comes out of the culture of co-funding. If you claim to VC Tom that you have other interest from VC Bob, Tom is going to call Bob and believe his word over yours, which is morally wrong. It means that they're colluding rather than competing, which means they fund (or decline to fund) as a group.
That gives VCs lasting power over founders' reputations and their companies. They're no longer passive investors, but actively able to turn off interest in other firms that ought to be competitors. Which means that VCs are no longer competing for deals, but colluding as a group and competing against founders.
Obviously, the extortion is rarely explicitly spelled out, but it's implied in the ability to "pick up a phone" and blackball a founder.
- rfergie 12y ago> Tom is going to call Bob and believe his word over yours, which is morally wrong Just to be clear here - are you are saying that Tom calling Bob is morally wrong? Or that Tom believing Bob over you is morally wrong? The former makes sense to me as it is collusion rather than competition. The latter not so much
- michaelochurch 12y agoThe former. Sorry if that wasn't clear. It's not like Tom can "unhear" Bob once the call is made.
- IndianAstronaut 12y agoOh wow, I am very surprised nothing has been done about this. People in the bay are very politically active.