3 ms·
I'd have to imagine they have something. It explicitly mentions twice-daily meetings, so there must be some insider knowledge of what went on. Besides, the col
by themartorana 12y ago
I'd have to imagine they have something. It explicitly mentions twice-daily meetings, so there must be some insider knowledge of what went on.
Besides, the collective lawyer-power of these banks is no joke. You don't go against them unless you have them dead-to-rights.
As an aside, if they DO have this kind of info, it will have to set off international investigations of the LIBOR scandal type, no?
- Lazare 12y ago> It explicitly mentions twice-daily meetings, so there must be some insider knowledge of what went on. Not at all. "The fixing process is governed by a set of Rules for the Administration and Conduct of The London Platinum and Palladium Market Fixings (the Fixing Rules).The current version of the Fixing Rules, made under Article 74 of The London Platinum and Palladium Fixing Company Limited’s Articles of Association, became effective on 29 July 2014. Pursuant to the Fixing Rules, representatives of the four members of The London Platinum and Palladium Fixing Company Limited (the Company) dial in to a secure conference facility to determine the single trading prices for platinum and palladium at 9.45 am and 2.00 pm London time on each London business day. The price for platinum is determined first, followed by the price for palladium." That's a quote from here: http://www.lppm.com/contentitem.aspx?cid=19 http://www.lppm.com/contentitem.aspx?cid=19 And it refers to how (at the moment) the price of platinum and palladium is officially reported. The allegation is not that the twice-daily meetings occurred, it's that the results of those meetings was rigged.
- tomp 12y agoGiven that there are only 4 members that decide on the price, it seems like it's rigged by design.