3 ms·
> - f*-up licence (open-source, but modifications can only be distributed as source-code patches) I didn't look at the license very closely, but there are a fe
by eta_expand 12y ago
> - f*-up licence (open-source, but modifications can only be distributed as source-code patches)
I didn't look at the license very closely, but there are a few forks of the language out there (check out github), which aren't distributed as patches.
- edwintorok 12y agoIANAL but I think git makes it pretty clear what is the original software and what are the modifications which seems to be exactly what QPL requires: "distribute your modifications, in a form that is separate from the Software, such as patches."
- tomp 12y agoNope; you can download "master" (or branch) zip from GitHub, which contains the original with modifications, not separate. It's clearly against the licence.